What I'm saying is that Bush used these forged "evidence" AS FACT. From way back in Sep he's been yapping his propaganda and lies. Why didn't he check if it was a forgery first? Or maybe he knew it was a forgery yet he still used it as fact. This is the freaking U.S.A I'm talking about with a budget of trillions and almost 1/2 a trillion in defense alone. What kind of a country is he running if he is using forged documents as facts and evidence, and then goes and kills scores of innocent people and destroys within 48 hours the history of a 7000 year old country (I'm talking about the looting of the museums here). The fact is I don't have to prove anything. Bush the Chimp does. He is the president of the most powerful country in the world and has resources to him that nobody else does. Yet he used forged documents as facts and as evidence. Didn't he check them out first? Or did he knew they were forged to begin with and didn't give a damn but he used them anyway cause they served his criminal purpose? Or maybe the Bush administration knew all along they were forged documents to begin with. After all, we live in a country were you are innocent till proven guilty, right? Or do we?
The fact is that this administration has a history of secrecy, lies, propaganda, special interests and secret agendas. If this administration had any honor and truthfulness, they would have allowed the UN to have a major rebuilding role in Iraq including the WMDs. But it clearly shows instead that the Bush administration is doing this with totally different motives at hand. Only the extreme politically blinded people can't see that.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
