I guess it was expressing frustration about only originally urging some serious caution at this point & I used what I thought was some good examples to illustrate it, since there were a lot of similarities in terms of the "sure thing" factor et al & so many ppl lost so much $. But it didn't go over well.. so just been instead alluding to the many comments that attach themselves to the "sure thing" sentiment & so I said why not then bet the farm. That question was meant to draw out from whoever reading, that caution is a really good thing at this point. In fact I don't think know caution is strong enuff. I wish the best for all & i'm in long too, but something doesn't seem right (maybe). I guess the clearest way I can put is that it's at this stage of a play, w/all the apparent 'sure & massive thing' commentary abounding, while for month's, pps languishes & is dropping into 6's, that a voice of caution was a appropriate. But it gets me treated like a basher...
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
