News Focus
News Focus
icon url

gitreal

09/10/13 4:47 PM

#2580 RE: Knuck42 #2577

Damn, thought I had actually found the one person that might have seen the feasibility report. Guess not.

I do congratulate you on doing some research on geology and barite deposits. It is all guesswork, even on my part, about what type of deposit it is, because no geological report has been made available. And the nonsensical, random word generator blurbs that MBMI has posted about the deposit are comical.

The SedEx theory of yours is fine, but does not jive with the statement by MBMI of cross-cutting geologic boundaries. SedEx deposits are congruent with sedimentary structures, not cross-cutting.

As for the metals, I am just quoting from MBMI's speculation that there is an underlying deposit of metals (gold, etc. but not silver for some bizarre reason). If you want to throw in tungsten, etc, go for it. There is no data to support any of that.

As for the ADIT thing, I am just puzzled by why it is capitalized. I think everyone is in agreement with what an adit is, but why the capitalization? I truly think whoever the numbskull is that wrote that PR thinks it stands for something.
icon url

gitreal

09/10/13 4:52 PM

#2582 RE: Knuck42 #2577

By the way, veinlets of barite cutting the host rock would not make for a very easily mined and milled orebody. Maybe a vein stockwork is good for gold mining, but in a barite mine, it represents a lot of waste rock and a lot of processing. Perhaps the feasibility study discussed this....? Guess we'll never know.