InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Ispro

01/09/06 1:48 PM

#106139 RE: greg s #106137

Greg...bundling with the mobos!

I think they´ll use the new series!

BR

ISPRO
icon url

Jaybeaux

01/09/06 2:07 PM

#106140 RE: greg s #106137

Please indicate anywhere in "this" particular thread discussion where ViiV was mentioned.

TIA,

Jaybeaux
icon url

jmslat

01/09/06 2:31 PM

#106144 RE: greg s #106137

conjecture keeps wind in the sails, while material contracts with explicitly stated revenue-related guarantees provide fuel to drive forward -- one thing is painfully clear: this "DD" board is extrapolating on conjecture, not fuel!
icon url

TonyMcFadden

01/09/06 5:06 PM

#106157 RE: greg s #106137

greg, my statement was a reply to your broad statement:

IF Wave had defensible IP, they could collect royalties or enjoy being bought out. Without defensible IP, Wave is a no op.

I was not referring to Viiv, as your post does not refer to Viiv.

I do not know if there are any patents held by Wave that are directly Viiv related.