InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,631.22
(
0.28%
)
US TECH 100
19,889.60
(
0.49%
)
Dow Jones
40,211.72
(
0.53%
)
Brent Oil
84.34
(
-0.30%
)
Bitcoin
64,344.63
(
5.86%
)
Post# of 249246
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

TonyMcFadden

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 40
Posts 5588
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 11/23/2002

TonyMcFadden

Member Level

Re: greg s post# 106137

Monday, 01/09/2006 5:06:23 PM

Monday, January 09, 2006 5:06:23 PM

Post# of 249246
greg, my statement was a reply to your broad statement:

IF Wave had defensible IP, they could collect royalties or enjoy being bought out. Without defensible IP, Wave is a no op.

I was not referring to Viiv, as your post does not refer to Viiv.

I do not know if there are any patents held by Wave that are directly Viiv related.

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. - Carl Sagan

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up