Replies to post #30008 on PPJ Healthcare Enterprises Inc (PPJE)

[EMPATHY]

HAHAHAH!!BaSu already lostagainst Doctor Grewal once!LOLOLO!!!


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:09-cv-05528-JFW-PJW

PPJ Enterprise, Inc. v. Narinder S. Grewal et al
Assigned to: Judge John F. Walter
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Date Filed: 07/28/2009
Date Terminated: 10/16/2009
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Plaintiff
PPJ Enterprise, Inc.
a Nevada Corporation represented by Michael John Hemming
Michael J Hemming Attorney at Law
333 West Mission Boulevard
Pomona, CA 91766
909-469-6087
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Defendant
Narinder S. Grewal
an individual
Defendant
Narider S. Grewal, M.D.
A Medical Corporation
doing business as
Santa Clarita Surgery Center For Advance Pain Management
Defendant
Does
1 through 10, inclusive

Date Filed # Docket Text
07/28/2009 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Narinder S. Grewal, Narider S. Grewal, M.D., Does 1 through 10, inclusive. (Filing fee $ 350 PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff PPJ Enterprise, Inc. (et) Modified on 7/31/2009 (et). (ds). (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/29/2009: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ds). (Entered: 07/31/2009)
07/28/2009 20 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendants Narinder S. Grewal, Narider S. Grewal, M.D., Does 1 through 10, inclusive. (et) (Entered: 07/31/2009)
07/29/2009 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff PPJ Enterprise, Inc. (et) (ds). (Entered: 07/31/2009)
08/03/2009 3 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 08-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 09-05528 JFW (PJWx). (rn) (Entered: 08/03/2009)
08/05/2009 4 CLERKS E-MAIL RE LOCAL RULE 3-2 TO COUNSEL on 8/5/09 addressed to [e-mail]. COURT REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE RESPONSE. Pursuant to Local Rule 3-2, you are required to e-mail, within 24 hours of filing, a Filed stamped copy of your complaint and other civil case initiating documents, in PDF format to the Court. To date, we have not received the PDF images of your filing. Please do so within 24 hours or this matter will be referred to the Chief Judge for further proceedings. (esa) (Entered: 08/05/2009)
08/05/2009 5 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULE 3-2 by Judge Audrey B. Collins: PLAINTIFF is reminded that all manually filed civil initiating documents shall be e-mailed to the Court within 24 hours of their filing with the Court in PDF format only. PLAINTIFF is hereby ordered to e-mail PDF copies of the Complaint, Summons, and Certification and Notice of Interested Parties to the Civil Intake e-mail address for the appropriate Court Division within 24 hours of the issuance of this order. Failure to do so will result in a hearing before this Court and imposition of sanctions pursuant to Local Rule 83-7(a). (esa) (Entered: 08/05/2009)
08/06/2009 6 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES; Memoranda of Points and Authorities in support of or in opposition to motions shall not exceed 25 pages; replies shall not exceed 12 pages (see document for further details). (kbr) (Entered: 08/06/2009)
08/06/2009 7 AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff PPJ Enterprise, Inc.. refiling of Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint and Complaint for Damages per court order (Hemming, Michael) (Entered: 08/06/2009)
08/07/2009 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: (1) Incorrect event selected; should have been selected under Category "Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints" and event to be used is "Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (20 days)" instead of Miscellaneous Document 7 event. (2) Incorrect Judge's Initial on Case number; should be "JFW" instead of "CBM". In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (jp) (Entered: 08/07/2009)
08/24/2009 9 NOTICE of Caption Amendment OF SERVICE filed by attorney for Plaintiff PPJ Enterprise, Inc., served on 8/24/09. (Hemming, Michael) (Entered: 08/24/2009)
09/02/2009 10 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge John F. Walter: Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than 9/17/2009, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. If Plaintiff files an amended complaint which corrects the jurisdictional defects noted above on or before 9/17/2009, the Court will consider that a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. (jp) (Entered: 09/03/2009)
09/11/2009 11 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge John F. Walter, ORDERING Motion to Dismiss submitted by Defendants Narinder S. Grewal, Narider S. Grewal, M.D. received on 9/10/2009 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Pursuant to General Order 08-02 Case is designated for electronic filing. (jp) (Entered: 09/15/2009)
09/17/2009 12 ***THIS DOCUMENT IS STRICKEN FROM THE COURT RECORD, PER DOCUMENT NUMBER 14*** AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff PPJ Enterprise, Inc.. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Hemming, Michael). Modified on 9/18/2009 (jp). (Entered: 09/17/2009)
09/18/2009 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: All initiating documents such as (First Amended Complaint) MUST be filed at the Civil Intake window, Pursuant to General Order 08-02, page 19 section "C"; After 24 hours, you must submit conformed copy of "Answer and Counterclaim is made by e-mail to the CV intake mail box. RE: Amended Document (Non-Motion) 12 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (jp) (Entered: 09/18/2009)
09/18/2009 14 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Coutroom Deputy Clerk for Judge John F. Walter. In accordance with the Notice to Filer Of Deficiencies In Electronically Filed Documents. REGARDING: The Amended Document (First Amended Complaint) 12 is STRICKEN and counsel is ordered to file an amended document by 9/21/2009. All initiating documents such as (First Amended Complaint) MUST be filed at the Civil Intake window, Pursuant to General Order 08-02, page 19 Section "C"; After 24 hours, you must submit conformed copy of "First Amended Complaint is made by e-mail to the CV intake mail box. (jp) (Entered: 09/18/2009)
09/24/2009 16 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Narinder S. Grewal, Narider S. Grewal, M.D., Does amending Complaint - (Discovery) 1 . Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff PPJ Enterprise. Inc. (jp) (Entered: 09/25/2009)
09/25/2009 15 AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff PPJ Enterprise, Inc.. Civil Case Cover Sheet (Hemming, Michael) (Entered: 09/25/2009)
09/28/2009 17 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS FURTHER ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge John F. Walter: Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than 10/7/2009, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. If Plaintiff files an amended complaint which corrects the jurisdictional defects noted above on or before 10/7/2009, the Court will consider that a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. (jp) (Entered: 09/29/2009)
09/29/2009 18 PDF DOCUMENTS RECEIVED RE LOCAL RULE 3-2. The following PDF Documents were received by the Court on 9/29/09: Complaint, Notice of Assignment, Summons, Civil Cover Sheet, Certification and Notice of Interested Parties. (ds) (Entered: 09/29/2009)
09/29/2009 19 PDF DOCUMENTS ATTACHED TO DOCKET RE LOCAL RULE 3-2. The following PDF Documents were attached to the Court docket on 9/29/09: Complaint, Notice of Assignment, Summons, Civil Cover Sheet, Certification and Notice of Interested Parties. (ds) (Entered: 09/29/2009)
10/07/2009 20 AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff PPJ Enterprise, Inc.. 2ND Amended Complaint (Hemming, Michael) Modified on 10/8/2009 (se). STRICKEN (Entered: 10/07/2009)
10/08/2009 21 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: All initiating documents such as (Second Amended Complaint 20 ) MUST be filed at the Civil Intake window, Pursuant to General Order 08-02, page 19 section "C"; After 24 hours, you must submit conformed copy of "Answer and Counterclaim is made by e-mail to the CV intake mail box. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (jp) (Entered: 10/08/2009)
10/08/2009 22 ORDER by Judge John F. Walter STRIKING document 22. Counsel is ordered to file the 2nd Amended Complaint at the Civil Intake window by 10/8/09 at 4:00 p.m. RE: Amended Document (Non-Motion) 20 . All initiating documents MUST be filed at the Civil Intake window, Pursuant to General Order 08-02, page 19 section "C"; After 24 hours, you must submit conformed copy of 2nd Amended Complaint by e-mail to the CV intake mail box. Counsel was informed of the correct procedure upon filing the 1st Amended Complaint. (se) (Entered: 10/08/2009)
10/08/2009 23 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Narinder S. Grewal, Narider S. Grewal, M.D., Does amending First Amended Complaint 16 ,filed by plaintiff PPJ Enterprise, Inc. (esa) (jp). (Entered: 10/08/2009)
10/16/2009 24 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge John F. Walter: Accordingly, because Plaintiff has failed to allege the facts essential for the subject matter jurisdiction of this court despite two opportunities to do so, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Entered: 10/16/2009)

ACTUAL COURT DOCUMENTS BEAT BaSu PR's,LIES, AND RE-WRITING SEC FILINGS!!!

AFTER HER CASE GETS THROWN OUT OF COURT IN A FEW MORE YEARS AFTER MORE DELAYS,THE GREAT DOCTOR OF MEDICINE,DOCTOR NARINDER S. GREWAL MD. WILL SUE BaSu RIGHT OUT OF THE COUNTRY!!!

I'LL HELP HER GET ON A PLANE,SINCE SHE TOO "LETHARGIC" TO SHOW UP FOR HER OWN GREAT KORT CASE !!!ALL THOSE TWINKIES,SITTING AROUND WHILE HER SHAM COMPANY FAILS SHE PROBABLY WOULDN'T FIT IN A SEAT!
AHHHHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!!!!

BYE BaSu!!!!DON'T COME BACK!!!!!!LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!

[Farmboynate]

PPJE already won a Trial VS Gerald where he tried to sue Ms basu and PPJE for 3 million dollar where they found that he had stole millions from the company why he didn't win the trial and ms basu won and was told to file suit against him.... there is also a good chance he will end up going to jail after this as well "Criminal Investigation with the U.S. Security and Exchange Commissions against Grewal." They found the proof they needed other wise it would have been thrown out a long time ago and its been going on for 4 years now not 24 minutes and scammer Gerald knows ms basu now has the papers and evidence to win..
other wise when Mr Gerawl wouldn't have lost when he tried to sue her for 3 million dollars and the trial was awarded to Ms basu with the judge telling her to sue garawl

" Healthcare Business Services Groups, Inc. (Delaware Corporation a subsidiary of the Nevada Company) moved its office from 1120 W Foothill Blvd Suite 105 and 106 Upland, CA 91786 and moved to 818 N Mountain Ave, Suite 200, Upland, CA 91786 which was approximately 2600 sqft prestigious space with one year lease. The company kept approximately 11 employees and 5 consultants until end of Oct 2007 and then reduced employees down to 5 and 3 consultants and continued its operation until the Company discovered that its former Client Dr. Narinder S. Grewal (Grewal) was scamming the Company out of millions of dollars of its assets. Due to Grewal’s scam, the Company suffered in excess of estimated $100,000,000 million of dollars of loss during the years of 2001 to 2013. Assets discovered are listed in Exhibit-B which adds up to more than $3,204,919.14 million dollars, having this information and the evidence in possession the Company brought a lawsuit against Dr Narinder S. Grewal residence of Chatsworth, California practicing in of Santa Clarita California, Lancaster and his companies such as Santa Clarita Surgery Center for Advance Pain Management and Narinder S Grewal, MD, Inc. on December 3, 2009 in Los Angeles Superior Court, Los Angeles, California, Case NO. LA BC 427192. Trial on this Case is currently set for October 30, 2013. In addition, Dr. Grewal breached the agreement for “Medical Billing Agreement” with the Company in all terms including Non Compete clause and stole the Company’s proprietary billing methods and started a billing company naming “G3 Healthcare Business Services, Inc.” which is almost identical name of the company’s prior subsidiary billing company and became a pain management billing provider and competed with the business of the Company. Narinder S. Grewal and his wife Pritpal Grewal practically stole the Company’s identity and become the mirror image of the Registrant’s business. Grewal operates his billing service in Lancaster, California. The Company is also suing Dr. Grewal and his companies for breach of agreement for Non Compete. The Company located 2085 patients of Dr. Grewal were missing from the exclusive billing service agreement during the year of 2004 to 2007. The Company was deprived of more than $4,000,000 to $7,000,000 in revenue in addition to $3,204,919.14 he scammed the Company. The Company is working to confirm the amount of loss based on evidence. During the year of 2004 and 2007, Grewal was also a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, while he was a fiduciary of the Company and scamming the Company of its assets, the Company is considering to file a Criminal Investigation with the U.S. Security and Exchange Commissions against Grewal.



Due to the negligence of CPA Mr. Ankit Jain of Lake Forest, California 2007 yearly financial only contains the half year of 2007of the actual operational activities. Mr. Jain failed to perform his duties to complete the second half of the Company’s bank statements to prepare an accurate financial for which he was paid for.



The company was aware of over payments to Narinder S. Grewal and his companies (Grewal) for approximately $706,000 as of 2005 and continued to work with Grewal to recover this money. But the Company had no knowledge of the findings in 2009 that Grewal has been scamming the Company of approximately $3.204,919.14 since year 2000. In 2007 auditors were informed of the over payments but they ignored to publish because the financials based on cash basis not accrual and due to no signed confirmation from Dr. Grewal at that time. It was disputed by the company but the Company was unaware of the true facts of how the over payments happened.



During a court trial between Ms. Chandana Basu and Dr. Grewal in 2009 where Dr. Grewal claimed that the company did not pay all money due him and sued Ms. Basu for $3,000,000. At that time Ms. Basu provided the court with 7 years of accounting review that revealed Dr. Grewal was paid in excess of $3,204,919.14 over and above due Grewal. Ms Basu won the trial in that case but Judge ruled that the Company must sue Grewal to recover the money. Later that year by a detail analysis with original books and records, the company came to concluded that Grewal received $3,204,919.14 by scam and other various fraudulent actions.

[$UPERMAN]

Jury Trial Against Dr.Grewal Starts Mid October.

PPJE already won a Trial VS Gerald where he tried to sue Ms basu and PPJE for 3 million dollar where they found that he had stole millions from the company why he didn't win the trial and ms basu won and was told to file suit against him.... there is also a good chance he will end up going to jail after this as well "Criminal Investigation with the U.S. Security and Exchange Commissions against Grewal."

" Healthcare Business Services Groups, Inc. (Delaware Corporation a subsidiary of the Nevada Company) moved its office from 1120 W Foothill Blvd Suite 105 and 106 Upland, CA 91786 and moved to 818 N Mountain Ave, Suite 200, Upland, CA 91786 which was approximately 2600 sqft prestigious space with one year lease. The company kept approximately 11 employees and 5 consultants until end of Oct 2007 and then reduced employees down to 5 and 3 consultants and continued its operation until the Company discovered that its former Client Dr. Narinder S. Grewal (Grewal) was scamming the Company out of millions of dollars of its assets. Due to Grewal’s scam, the Company suffered in excess of estimated $100,000,000 million of dollars of loss during the years of 2001 to 2013. Assets discovered are listed in Exhibit-B which adds up to more than $3,204,919.14 million dollars, having this information and the evidence in possession the Company brought a lawsuit against Dr Narinder S. Grewal residence of Chatsworth, California practicing in of Santa Clarita California, Lancaster and his companies such as Santa Clarita Surgery Center for Advance Pain Management and Narinder S Grewal, MD, Inc. on December 3, 2009 in Los Angeles Superior Court, Los Angeles, California, Case NO. LA BC 427192. Trial on this Case is currently set for October 30, 2013. In addition, Dr. Grewal breached the agreement for “Medical Billing Agreement” with the Company in all terms including Non Compete clause and stole the Company’s proprietary billing methods and started a billing company naming “G3 Healthcare Business Services, Inc.” which is almost identical name of the company’s prior subsidiary billing company and became a pain management billing provider and competed with the business of the Company. Narinder S. Grewal and his wife Pritpal Grewal practically stole the Company’s identity and become the mirror image of the Registrant’s business. Grewal operates his billing service in Lancaster, California. The Company is also suing Dr. Grewal and his companies for breach of agreement for Non Compete. The Company located 2085 patients of Dr. Grewal were missing from the exclusive billing service agreement during the year of 2004 to 2007. The Company was deprived of more than $4,000,000 to $7,000,000 in revenue in addition to $3,204,919.14 he scammed the Company. The Company is working to confirm the amount of loss based on evidence. During the year of 2004 and 2007, Grewal was also a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, while he was a fiduciary of the Company and scamming the Company of its assets, the Company is considering to file a Criminal Investigation with the U.S. Security and Exchange Commissions against Grewal.



Due to the negligence of CPA Mr. Ankit Jain of Lake Forest, California 2007 yearly financial only contains the half year of 2007of the actual operational activities. Mr. Jain failed to perform his duties to complete the second half of the Company’s bank statements to prepare an accurate financial for which he was paid for.



The company was aware of over payments to Narinder S. Grewal and his companies (Grewal) for approximately $706,000 as of 2005 and continued to work with Grewal to recover this money. But the Company had no knowledge of the findings in 2009 that Grewal has been scamming the Company of approximately $3.204,919.14 since year 2000. In 2007 auditors were informed of the over payments but they ignored to publish because the financials based on cash basis not accrual and due to no signed confirmation from Dr. Grewal at that time. It was disputed by the company but the Company was unaware of the true facts of how the over payments happened.



During a court trial between Ms. Chandana Basu and Dr. Grewal in 2009 where Dr. Grewal claimed that the company did not pay all money due him and sued Ms. Basu for $3,000,000. At that time Ms. Basu provided the court with 7 years of accounting review that revealed Dr. Grewal was paid in excess of $3,204,919.14 over and above due Grewal. Ms Basu won the trial in that case but Judge ruled that the Company must sue Grewal to recover the money. Later that year by a detail analysis with original books and records, the company came to concluded that Grewal received $3,204,919.14 by scam and other various fraudulent actions.

[Farmboynate]

PPJE already won a Trial VS Gerald where he tried to sue Ms basu and PPJE for 3 million dollar where they found that he had stole millions from the company why he didn't win the trial and ms basu won and was told to file suit against him.... there is also a good chance he will end up going to jail after this as well "Criminal Investigation with the U.S. Security and Exchange Commissions against Grewal."

" Healthcare Business Services Groups, Inc. (Delaware Corporation a subsidiary of the Nevada Company) moved its office from 1120 W Foothill Blvd Suite 105 and 106 Upland, CA 91786 and moved to 818 N Mountain Ave, Suite 200, Upland, CA 91786 which was approximately 2600 sqft prestigious space with one year lease. The company kept approximately 11 employees and 5 consultants until end of Oct 2007 and then reduced employees down to 5 and 3 consultants and continued its operation until the Company discovered that its former Client Dr. Narinder S. Grewal (Grewal) was scamming the Company out of millions of dollars of its assets. Due to Grewal’s scam, the Company suffered in excess of estimated $100,000,000 million of dollars of loss during the years of 2001 to 2013. Assets discovered are listed in Exhibit-B which adds up to more than $3,204,919.14 million dollars, having this information and the evidence in possession the Company brought a lawsuit against Dr Narinder S. Grewal residence of Chatsworth, California practicing in of Santa Clarita California, Lancaster and his companies such as Santa Clarita Surgery Center for Advance Pain Management and Narinder S Grewal, MD, Inc. on December 3, 2009 in Los Angeles Superior Court, Los Angeles, California, Case NO. LA BC 427192. Trial on this Case is currently set for October 30, 2013. In addition, Dr. Grewal breached the agreement for “Medical Billing Agreement” with the Company in all terms including Non Compete clause and stole the Company’s proprietary billing methods and started a billing company naming “G3 Healthcare Business Services, Inc.” which is almost identical name of the company’s prior subsidiary billing company and became a pain management billing provider and competed with the business of the Company. Narinder S. Grewal and his wife Pritpal Grewal practically stole the Company’s identity and become the mirror image of the Registrant’s business. Grewal operates his billing service in Lancaster, California. The Company is also suing Dr. Grewal and his companies for breach of agreement for Non Compete. The Company located 2085 patients of Dr. Grewal were missing from the exclusive billing service agreement during the year of 2004 to 2007. The Company was deprived of more than $4,000,000 to $7,000,000 in revenue in addition to $3,204,919.14 he scammed the Company. The Company is working to confirm the amount of loss based on evidence. During the year of 2004 and 2007, Grewal was also a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, while he was a fiduciary of the Company and scamming the Company of its assets, the Company is considering to file a Criminal Investigation with the U.S. Security and Exchange Commissions against Grewal.



Due to the negligence of CPA Mr. Ankit Jain of Lake Forest, California 2007 yearly financial only contains the half year of 2007of the actual operational activities. Mr. Jain failed to perform his duties to complete the second half of the Company’s bank statements to prepare an accurate financial for which he was paid for.



The company was aware of over payments to Narinder S. Grewal and his companies (Grewal) for approximately $706,000 as of 2005 and continued to work with Grewal to recover this money. But the Company had no knowledge of the findings in 2009 that Grewal has been scamming the Company of approximately $3.204,919.14 since year 2000. In 2007 auditors were informed of the over payments but they ignored to publish because the financials based on cash basis not accrual and due to no signed confirmation from Dr. Grewal at that time. It was disputed by the company but the Company was unaware of the true facts of how the over payments happened.



During a court trial between Ms. Chandana Basu and Dr. Grewal in 2009 where Dr. Grewal claimed that the company did not pay all money due him and sued Ms. Basu for $3,000,000. At that time Ms. Basu provided the court with 7 years of accounting review that revealed Dr. Grewal was paid in excess of $3,204,919.14 over and above due Grewal. Ms Basu won the trial in that case but Judge ruled that the Company must sue Grewal to recover the money. Later that year by a detail analysis with original books and records, the company came to concluded that Grewal received $3,204,919.14 by scam and other various fraudulent actions.
- 8 - "