News Focus
News Focus
icon url

zolax

01/08/06 12:10 AM

#74639 RE: ducksticks #74638

The only irrational sub numbers are yours. The way you figured it out is the way my seven year old daughter would have done it
icon url

Profe$$or

01/08/06 12:12 AM

#74640 RE: ducksticks #74638

You remind me of the teacher from the Charlie Brown cartoons......WAH..WAH WAH WAH WAH...WAH

"What you are shouts so loudly in my ears, I cannot hear what you say"

- Henry David Thoreau
icon url

Agent1107

01/08/06 12:20 AM

#74643 RE: ducksticks #74638

dumbsticks,

Have you heard of SIRI? Yep...and they have a legit product, just as GZFX. Either show some "proof" of your opinions, or go rant somewhere else. You have admitted you sold for a loss, and you have been on a mission against this company for over a year.

SEEK HELP!
icon url

Agent1107

01/08/06 12:26 AM

#74647 RE: ducksticks #74638

dumsticks,

Do you know what the CEO's response was to the T/A "gag" you refer to? Tell me what his reponse was. Are you afraid to call him? Not that it matters, since you are on a "mission".

LOL
icon url

Sentinel

01/08/06 11:27 AM

#74791 RE: ducksticks #74638

ducksticks.....A couple of things from your post before we begin:

******************************************

Besides you played the same tune last year when you were told that the dilution was ongoing, you kept posting & defending the old numbers. WELL THE DILUTION WAS ONGOING, AND IS STILL ONGOING......

YOU GUYS WANTED TO PRETEND THE NUMBERS WERE 400 MILLION, filing came out....they were 900 million, then you wanted to pretend they were 900 million, filing came out....they were 1.2 billion, IT'S THE SAME OLD BIASED TUNE WITH YOU. BUT IT'S DIFFERENT NOW, convertible debenture financing and a filing spelling out the dilution.....

But some of us who were in on the faxing of the TA, before the ceo gagged that avenue too, know that 1 week after 9/30 the O/S broached 1.4 billion.

(Rest of post omitted)


******************************************

OK...So obviously you've been here for quite a while, yet have chosen to hide behind a new alias born on January 5, 2006. Why the secrecy. Which name, or names, were you posting under before? If you want to have a debate with somebody, you have to respect them. So far, I see nothing to respect in you. Most here have had the personal integrity to keep a clear record of their posts, by keeping only one single screen name. So 'fess up, so we're all on an even playing field here. List your previous alias', including the one you posted under when you lost money in GZFX, and perhaps you'll get the answers, or at least replies, you seek. If not, you're just another drooling and yapping, knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing, cyber-coward. Cheers.