The PR was released on the same day as the 10Q. The company knew exactly what the costs were for that plastic that created the 82,000 gallons of fuel from July 1 to August 12. It was surely taken from the inventory that was carried over and in the Q2 10Q. How would they not have a clue on those costs? But lets pretend they were clueless, at the very least companies release guidance all the time around revenue, costs, gross margins, eps, pick your metric. And JBI could have easily provided Q3 guidance they provided a more complete picture. But that assumes they were truly interested in providing a complete picture for investors. There is only a dozen ways or more they could have provided that picture, but instead they cherry picked metrics.
At the VERY least they could have released what processor #3 produced versus obfuscating it with processor #2. Again processor #2 according to the company's own filings assuming you tend to believe them, should have done at least 75% of the production mentioned in the 10Q.
Finally, they make ZERO claim about processor #3 and HTF expanding the aperture of feedstock they can accept. Are you making that claim on their behalf?