News Focus
News Focus
icon url

F6

08/20/13 3:29 AM

#208007 RE: F6 #207920

Tea party favorite Cruz disputes claim of dual citizenship with Canada, releases birth certificate

Aug 19, 2013
http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/story/23174780/cruz-birth-certificate


--


Ted Cruz' Birth Certificate Proves He's Eligible to Run...For Canadian PM

August 19, 2013
http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/ted-cruz-releases-his-birth-certificate [with comments]


--


Ted Cruz Releases Birth Certificate — and Is Apparently a Canadian Citizen (But…)

Aug. 19, 2013
[...]
“He’s a Canadian,” attorney Stephen Green, the former head of the Canadian Bar Association’s Citizenship and Immigration Section, told the Dallas Morning News [ http://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/headlines/20130818-canada-born-ted-cruz-became-a-citizen-of-that-country-as-well-as-u.s..ece ].
Cruz’s office denied knowing he had dual U.S.-Canadian citizenship.
[...]


[...]
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/19/ted-cruz-releases-birth-certificate-and-is-apparently-a-canadian-citizen-but/ [with comments]


--


Ted Cruz, Canadian-American

Aug 19 2013
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/08/ted-cruz-canadian-american/278825/ [with comments]


--


Ted Cruz Discovered He's a Canadian Citizen From Reading the Dallas Morning News

Aug. 19, 2013
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2013/08/19/ted_cruz_canada_calgary_born_texas_republican_has_dual_us_canadian_citizenship.html [with comments]


--


Ted Cruz: ‘I Will Renounce Any Canadian Citizenship’


Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Getty Images)

By Abby D. Phillip
Aug 19, 2013 4:10pm

WASHINGTON — Here are the facts: Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who may run for president in 2016, was born in Canada and his mother was a U.S. citizen.

Most legal scholars and Cruz agree that he’s an American. And if Cruz chooses to run for president in 2016, his technical Canadian citizenship shouldn’t matter, either.

But it seems to matter to Cruz.

After a spokesman initially denied that Cruz was a dual citizen, the senator said in a statement that he will renounce his Canadian citizenship.

“Now the Dallas Morning News says that I may technically have dual citizenship,” Cruz said. “Assuming that is true, then sure, I will renounce any Canadian citizenship.

“Nothing against Canada, but I’m an American by birth and as a U.S. senator, I believe I should be only an American.”

Cruz released a copy of his birth certificate to the Dallas Morning News [ http://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/headlines/20130818-dual-citizenship-may-pose-problem-if-ted-cruz-seeks-presidency.ece ] over the weekend, proving that he was, in fact, born in Calgary, Canada, on Dec. 22, 1970. According to an expert in Canadian law quoted by the Dallas Morning News, that means “he’s a Canadian.”

But at first Cruz, through a spokesman, denied that he was a Canadian citizen, despite the incontrovertible fact that he was born there.

“Sen. Cruz became a U.S. citizen at birth, and he never had to go through a naturalization process after birth to become a U.S. citizen,” Cruz spokeswoman Catherine Frazier told the Dallas Morning News. “To our knowledge, he never had Canadian citizenship, so there is nothing to renounce.”

Why duck his Canadian birth?

Here’s a clue: Billionaire-turned-political-agitator Donald Trump, arguably the only voice of the birther conspiracy theorists, also believes that being born in Canada is a problem for Cruz.

When asked whether he thought Cruz was eligible to run for president, Trump told ABC News’ Jonathan Karl [ http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/08/donald-trump-sen-ted-cruz-perhaps-not-eligible-for-white-house-if-born-in-canada/ ]: “If he was born in Canada, perhaps not. I don’t know the circumstances. I heard somebody told me he was born in Canada. That’s really his thing.”

Incidentally, Trump also doubts whether President Obama, who was born in Hawaii to an American mother, is eligible to be president.

Trump has not yet responded to an ABC News request for comment on the latest revelations.

On the other hand, the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation has already made the case in its handy Guide to the Constitution [ http://www.heritage.org/constitution#!/articles/2/essays/82/presidential-eligibility ] that the child of a U.S. citizen is considered by most constitutional commentators to be eligible for the presidency, regardless of where they were born.

The non-partisan Congressional Research Service made a similar finding [ http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42097.pdf ].

So it seems Cruz initially was erring on the side of Donald Trump’s interpretation of things and making a play to appease those who might be uncomfortable with his place of birth.

Liberal columnist Jonathan Capehart made the case today [ http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2013/08/19/ted-cruz-should-say-no-canada/ ] that Cruz should renounce Canada for no other reason than the fact that “it wouldn’t look right.”

Meanwhile, Obama’s camp seems to think turnabout is fair play.

On Twitter, David Plouffe, Obama’s former campaign manager, poked fun at Cruz, despite or perhaps in light of the annoyance that “birther” rumors caused for his boss.

“Calgary Sun will need to get a primer on Iowa Caucus math,” Plouffe tweeted [ https://twitter.com/davidplouffe/status/369475794566803456 ].

Copyright © 2013 ABC News Internet Ventures. Yahoo! - ABC News Network

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/08/could-ted-cruz-be-the-first-canadian-american-president/ [with comments]


--


Cruz says he will renounce any Canadian citzenship after releasing birth certificate

August 20, 2013
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/20/cruz-disputes-claim-dual-citizenship-with-canada-releases-birth-certificate/ [with comments]


--


(linked in) http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=91180028 and preceding and following


icon url

F6

08/25/13 4:46 AM

#208236 RE: F6 #207920

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman files Donald Trump 'University' $40 million fraud suit

[(linked in) http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=87573151 and preceding and following]

The AG's office accuses the billionaire's Trump University of defrauding more than 5,000 people with promises that they would get 'hand-picked' teachers to help them get rich in real estate.
August 24, 2013
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/new-york-attorney-general-schneiderman-sues-donald-trump-40-million-fraud-suit-article-1.1436105 [with comments]


--


([linked in] http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=90373031 [and preceding and following])


--


NY AG Schneiderman sues Trump, ‘Trump University’ for fraud; Trump says probe is political

[(linked in) http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=87573151 and preceding and following]



By Associated Press, Published: August 24, 2013

ALBANY, N.Y. — New York’s attorney general sued Donald Trump for $40 million Saturday, saying the real estate mogul helped run a phony “Trump University” that promised to make students rich but instead steered them into expensive and mostly useless seminars, and even failed to deliver promised apprenticeships.

Trump shot back that the Democrat’s lawsuit is false and politically motivated.

Attorney General Eric Schneiderman says many of the 5,000 students who paid up to $35,000 thought they would at least meet Trump but instead all they got was their picture taken in front of a life-size picture of “The Apprentice” TV star.

“Trump University engaged in deception at every stage of consumers’ advancement through costly programs and caused real financial harm,” Schneiderman said. “Trump University, with Donald Trump’s knowledge and participation, relied on Trump’s name recognition and celebrity status to take advantage of consumers who believed in the Trump brand.”

But Trump’s attorney accused Schneiderman of trying to extort campaign contributions from the real estate mogul through his investigation of Trump. Attorney Michael D. Cohen told The Associated Press on Saturday that Schneiderman’s lawsuit was filled with falsehoods. Cohen said Trump and his university never defrauded anyone.

He said Trump University provided nearly 11,000 testimonials to Schneiderman from students praising the program and said 98 percent of students in a survey termed the program “excellent.”

“The attorney general has been angry because he felt that Mr. Trump and his various companies should have done much more for him in terms of fundraising,” Cohen said. “This entire investigation is politically motivated and it is a tremendous waste of taxpayers’ money.”

State Board of Elections records show Trump has spent more than $136,000 on New York campaigns since 2010. He contributed $12,500 to Schneiderman in October 2010, when Schneiderman was running for attorney general, records show. An outspoken conservative, Trump himself flirted with a presidential run last year.

“Donald Trump will not sit back and be extorted by anyone, including the attorney general,” Cohen said.

The lawsuit says many of the wannabe moguls were unable to land even one real estate deal and were left far worse off than before the lessons, facing thousands of dollars in debt for the seminar program once billed as a top quality university with Trump’s “hand-picked” instructors.

Schneiderman is suing the program, Trump as the university chairman, and the former president of the university in a case to be handled in state Supreme Court in Manhattan. He accuses them of engaging in persistent fraud, illegal and deceptive conduct and violating federal consumer protection law. The $40 million he seeks is mostly to pay restitution to consumers.

He dismissed Trump’s claim of a political motive.

“The fact that he’s still brave enough to follow the investigation wherever it may lead speaks to Mr. Schneiderman’s character,” Schneiderman spokesman Andrew Friedman told AP.

State Education Department officials had told Trump to change the name of his enterprise years ago, saying it lacked a license and didn’t meet the legal definitions of a university. In 2011 it was renamed the Trump Entrepreneur Institute, but it has been dogged since by complaints from consumers and a few isolated civil lawsuits claiming it didn’t fulfill its advertised claims.

Schneiderman’s lawsuit covers complaints dating to 2005 through 2011. Students paid between $1,495 and $35,000 to learn from the Manhattan mogul who wrote the best seller, “Art of the Deal” a decade ago followed by “How to Get Rich” and “Think Like a Billionaire.”

Scheiderman said the three-day seminars didn’t, as promised, teach consumers everything they needed to know about real estate. The Trump University manual tells instructors not to let consumers “think three days will be enough to make them successful,” Schneiderman said.

At the seminars, consumers were told about “Trump Elite” mentorships that cost $10,000 to $35,000. Students were promised individual instruction until they made their first deal. Schneiderman said participants were urged to extend the limit on their credit cards for real estate deals, but then used the credit to pay for the Trump Elite programs. The attorney general said the program also failed to promptly cancel memberships as promised.

Consumers may file complaints at:

http://www.ag.ny.gov/bureaus/consumer_frauds/filing_a_consumer_complaint.html

© 2013 Associated Press

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/ny-ag-sues-trump-university-says-get-rich-promises-were-fraudulent-deceptive/2013/08/24/8d41ce40-0d21-11e3-89fe-abb4a5067014_story.html [with comments]


--


([linked in] http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=90373031 [and preceding and following])


--


(linked in):

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=62350997 and preceding and following;
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=62428404 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=81105754 and following