The point is the date they gave (2h14) does not appear to be consistent with the site #'s they are targetting times the enrollment rates they gave. Self inconsistency is a problem until there is a credible explanation.
Right and I think mgmt knows this too. They said the B trial would have results sometime 2Q-3Q of next year. It makes no sense to file solely on the B trial if they have high confidence A and C will have results before the end of 2014.
Puzzling that the 6-10 months more than expected time to bring ex-US sites online didn't happen to be a concern 3 months ago. As if they are the first co to have ex-US sites in a pivotal trial.