InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

hispeedsoul

08/07/13 11:26 AM

#133859 RE: Tom Orrow #133858

Why are any of us here talking it up or down? We are all killing time. Nobody on this board is affecting the share price by "talking it" in either direction. The share price is exactly where it should be based on progress or lack thereof.
icon url

supermegadope

08/07/13 11:51 AM

#133860 RE: Tom Orrow #133858

So then, why are they talking it down?



Talking it down to who? No one knows about the stock. You think we are at today's share price because shareholders are complaining about Scott's performance? Classic TomOrrow.
icon url

es1

08/07/13 11:57 AM

#133861 RE: Tom Orrow #133858

They arnt. They are talking AND its going down.
Remember back in august 2012? We were all lied to and told SOE was going to buy us out. "They" were all saying stuff like....

And to think, SRSR is just getting started. We're still insanely undervalued at .10 or .20



Were they just talking it up to sell some expensivies?

Then when Scott flakes why is it that, "They are looking to buy cheapies"?
When the company does good they speak good of it.
When the company does bad they speak badly about it.

What is the last thing you were mad at?
When you are mad are you just looking to save money?

My son comes home 3 am and I ground him for a month. Am I just "looking for cheapies" or is he actually doing something wrong?


Just because this CEO does not do the things that he said and someone calls him out about it doesnt mean they are looking to get a lower price.

You want to know why people keep coming here and putting down the company it is for 2 reasons.
#1 When saying something bad like "Scott lied" . It is true

#2 Someone always comes out and says something which is not even in the realm of reality. Scotts pedigree wont let him steal. Or There are a billion NNS


If I ask a question like what did scott spend $700K of YOUR money on, I am not looking for cheapies. I am looking for the people here who claim to know more than me to explain what it is I am missing that makes them think it is OK.

When you get the response of "You want cheapies" It is obvious that the person does not know an answer and is afraid of the question.
The only reason anyone would fear a question is because it is true. The reason they would attack the asker is because they do not want to admit they are on the losing side of a bet.

Insults fly here at the people who are actually posting the facts.

The fact of the matter is Scott lied.
The truth is the shareholders were screwed by scott. NOBODY wants to be the one to admit they were fooled. That doesnt make the facts any different.

Stating those facts doesnt make me wanting cheapies




icon url

moojer

08/07/13 12:13 PM

#133862 RE: Tom Orrow #133858

Day #142 since Scott "strong-armed" the Chinese and still NO DEAL OR UPDATE AS TO WHY THERE IS NO DEAL OR WHY THE SUPPOSED ROCK TESTING IS STILL NOT COMPLETED. In addition, no suitors jumping in to offer VIABLE/SUSTAINABLE financing. Lastly, no update as to the other supposed investors lining up?

....and since August 1st, 2012 right after the Chinese signed the first exclusivity deal, it has been 371 (THREE HUNDRED and SEVENTY-ONE) days and still NO DEAL! Wow, a year has passed and the inept Scott Keevil (of the famed Keevils) can't get anything done!

Scott issued intentions to issue Audited Financials five years ago and failed to do so and never followed up as to why he failed. We are fast approaching 6 years since this, one of his many failures,occurred.

Scott issued intentions to uplist five years ago and failed to do so and never followed up as to why he failed. We are fast approaching 6 years since this, one of his many failures, occurred.