"they have hundreds of tons of crayola coming"
Since you've made note of the crayola potential in a few of your recent posts I want to make sure that you didn't miss the mentions of Crayola in the recent Air State Facility Permit modification...there were three of them.
"This permit action combines changes associated
with the Modification 3 and Modification 4 permit applications as follows:
5. The list of allowable plastic feeds is being modified to allow the processing
of off-grade non-toxic Crayola products which may contain paper and clay as a
filler."
"Procured feedstock shall be source separated
non-recyclable polyolefins and polyethylenes and a relatively small quantity of off-spec Crayola products.
Used oil, meeting Part 225-1 and 225-2 requirements, will
be co-fed with the plastic to act as a heat transfer
medium and enhance the dissolution rate of the plastic."
"Off-spec Crayola products directly from the manufacturer
will also be used as a feedstock in cubic yard containers
and staged at the facility and fed into the reactors."
So "hundreds of tons of crayola" is "a relatively small amount". I'm not sure how much of your excitement is justified when each hundred tons "of crayola" can only be expected to generate less than $45,000 in revenues based on the most recent available pricing.
And what happened to the ColorCycle program? Why didn't JBI secure coverage for it in the permit modification? It should be obvious that the "Off-spec Crayola products directly from the manufacturer" are very different from the used markers shipped via Fedex from various sources, which don't meet the definition of the permitted material. Are the Fedex boxes piling up somewhere pending yet another modification?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
