News Focus
News Focus
icon url

big-yank

07/07/13 8:21 AM

#8299 RE: joev2 #8298

Changes in auditors are required by law to be reported. Disagreements between auditors and corporate boards are not all that infrequent, especially in Asian markets and can, as you say, result from a company restricting info available to the accountancy firm. But more typically the disputes are over the scope of auditor activities which are billed by the hour and often involve very expensive overseas travel in multi-national companies that a board of directors can prudently deem excessively costly.

If you are looking in earnest for the Boogieman then this 8-K might be important. If you are looking for answers as to Longwei's future, I think it is immaterial and premature to any conclusions except speculative ones.

I want to see something concrete before I make up my mind. I would not be at all surprised to see Red Chip re-affiliate once some of the dark clouds dissipate, assuming that they do. I have always valued their research and conference data; I will ascribe a lot less value to Red Chip going forward if Longwei tanks since they have been sending "buy" signals for 4 years and only reversed out of a contract extension a few days after the renewal announcement last December 28th.
icon url

honestengine_rh

07/07/13 9:14 PM

#8301 RE: joev2 #8298

The 8-K is saying that the 2012 and 2011 audited financial tatements are still unqualified, which means that the financial statements were fairly stated all in material respects. This amounts to a clean bill of health and is the highest audit opinion. In addition, Anderson Bradshaw is saying that they saw no problems through May 30, 2013. On May 31, 2013, there was apparently a 'scope limitation' which severed their relationship. A scope limitation could be something as minor as refusing to let the auditor see an invoice or talk to a clerk.

In their 1st quarter 2013 conference call, the Company had communicated to Anderson Bradshaw that they will eventually move on to a Big 4 firm. It appears to be a planned change that was initiated by the Company. If they do not hire a Big 4 firm, I think the Company will go private, like HRBN and FMCN, just recently. BTW, over 30 Chinese companies have left the NASDAQ in order to list elsewhere or go private.

http://www.thestreet.com/story/11937337/1/focus-media-holdings-successfully-exited-the-nasdaq-stock-market-in-a-record-38-billion-acquisition.html