News Focus
News Focus
icon url

liable

06/20/13 10:52 AM

#59400 RE: ~ TRT ~ #59399

Nah, you really need to read the filings. There are many awnings there, and even in past press releases about a possible share restructuring. Natalie used words like 'warn' and 'caution' which should not be ignored.
Predicting an the terns of any agreement that may or may not ever happen is completely absurd.
My DD tells me people will still be trying to sell this BS merger story months from now. My DD also tells me Natalie never ever said she was working on a merger.
icon url

MethodMan

06/20/13 11:10 AM

#59402 RE: ~ TRT ~ #59399

A reporting company with a low share structure is very attractive as a reverse merger candidate for a solid public company.

So true with any reverse merger just not the DUSS.

DUSS share structure primed for an 8K merger material event. The timeline shows Natalie is looking for Quality not a dump.

DUSS