News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Leirum

06/09/13 9:45 AM

#62856 RE: BettingAngles #62847

What a discovery. Of course as CFO he has to sign up for the filings, but he signed up based on what has been presented to him by his controler E.G.
Why do you think AAPT insists on this case to be handled in the court? And why do you think E.G. wanted to have this case dismissed?

This is a matter of trust. If you cannot trust your employees anymore then it is really bad for a company and if you cannot trust your controler anymore, then you can close your business.
But what nobody can protect itself if your controler is a criminal with a clear intention to defraud the company he is working for.What will catch up in court with E.G. is the sorry fact, that he already had a criminal past with 2 reported cases.
icon url

Leirum

06/09/13 9:47 AM

#62857 RE: BettingAngles #62847

So so, based on your Linkedin - he is no longer with AAPT. Just go into it again and read it right. Maybe you have to scroll down.
icon url

Conrade Lake

06/09/13 10:24 AM

#62864 RE: BettingAngles #62847

Facts, not fiction. Joel remains with the company as I spoke with him on Friday. I have previously called him on occassion over the weekend and he was there to take my call. To my knowledge there have been no dismissals and I personally do not think that a corporate officer attending an event in any country is the business of any investor. One more point, while neither AAPT or EG has had their day in court, no one can refute the actions of EG hurt every investor. Nothing EG did improved anyone's standing intellectually, socially, financially or legally.