News Focus
News Focus
icon url

modrica

05/21/13 3:55 PM

#64849 RE: SkunkRiverTradingCo #64848

good job , it seems like that lilrat iz guin down soon

imo

gl
icon url

odega

05/21/13 4:06 PM

#64851 RE: SkunkRiverTradingCo #64848

Thanks i'll contact her also,Yes keep it posted every so often for others to see and contact...
icon url

albosafy

05/21/13 4:30 PM

#64852 RE: SkunkRiverTradingCo #64848

Thanks grizz , this is very helpful.

wish you all the best

GLTA
icon url

mtns

05/21/13 6:27 PM

#64853 RE: SkunkRiverTradingCo #64848

Thanks grizz. I will definitely contact her. Hope lots of people do
icon url

#1 PATRIOTS_RSOX FAN

05/21/13 7:00 PM

#64854 RE: SkunkRiverTradingCo #64848

Thanks Grizz, I have time tonight, will put together letter and send to Rhonda Erickson. Guyer needs to be stoppped. I suffered thrue the 1st RS, the 2nd RS was a killer.

Thanks again and Good Luck
icon url

nagoya1

05/21/13 7:01 PM

#64855 RE: SkunkRiverTradingCo #64848

We should sticky this information, the SEC needs to give Guyer the full cavity search for not disclosing all his BS RS. CGFI
icon url

567tbd

05/21/13 7:01 PM

#64856 RE: SkunkRiverTradingCo #64848

Who would have thought this would go this way grizz? We thought the potential and DD was so solid. Sad, just, Sad!
icon url

sanbrunobaby

05/21/13 8:58 PM

#64860 RE: SkunkRiverTradingCo #64848

There is nothing illegal about a reverse split or even multiple reverses splits,so I am not sure what would be investigated on that one.There is no law against bad management.

-The issue of doing a reverse split combined with reducing authorized shares, then 1 day later increasing the authorised shares is an issue. The reason they did that according to my understanding of the rules is that to reverse split the stock and maintain or increase authorised shares (at the same time)requires a shareholders meeting. This is a bit odd how they did it to say the least.

- However, the press releases this year and what is on website the SEC engineering office at the very least would probably immediately issue a comment letter, and the company would need to respond, and probably issue retractions and take down much of their existing website.There is nothing really to investigate or time consuming here- if SEC engineering office sees this year's press releases they probably can draft a comment letter in an afternoon ! This is fastest means to put a stop to inane press releases that some people believe.)Company would probably answer but then consider de-registering the stock).

SEC has limited resources and has to prioritise, and again I dont think they are in the business of punishing poor managers.