I like that. It gives a total BS twist to DHSM.. Is there any facts to back it up that having 4 different directives in the same amount of years for DHSM being detrimental to share holders? We can say the increased sentiment against a revenue producer is dragging the price down? Or is it what we see in the news? We know that TDA and others are now exposed in naked shorting stocks and there are many court cases pending to that end. In my view, DHSM is going to join the band wagon.. Longs load up and hold, imo!~!!