Lol.. I like that. It gives a total BS twist to DHSM.. Is there any facts to back it up that having 4 different directives in the same amount of years for DHSM is detrimental to share holders? We can say the increased sentiment against a revenues producer is dragging the price down. We know that TDA and others are now exposed in naked shorting stocks and there are many court cases pending to that end. In my view, DHSM is going to joing the band wagon.. Longs load up and hold, imo!~!!
Guess you don't know much about online gambling. Sure wished I owned one, hey wait a minute I own shares in one and quite happy about it. Lets see if I was a smart person and one business didn't work why not move onto one that works, so what if it took 4 times. Good grief does it really have to be spelt out. JMHO
Just curious? When suggesting a company is a scam, what facts and data is there to support the accusations? Syberstalking is a big thing now, is this part of it on DHSM? I see where TDA is part of one in the news. I hope this is not one, let alone part of a group to take down DHSM, am I off base?