InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

HotrodHans2

03/27/03 11:20 PM

#33899 RE: Mattu #33898

Well Matt, that is your opinion, threatening us with jail or a boot on this subject is childish IMO...but your the guy with the button.

I don't know how you see it but I am not here playing games when cass starts her same ol' repetitious crap. I used to think it was attention she required..I don't see it that way anymore. She has managed to have eliminated or aggravated enough posters to just leave because of her intentional posts to incite anger against her. Maybe I'm just in the dark and you know otherwise.

The topic is about EDIG and standing behind our investment....all she has to do is prove to me and everyone else here that EDIG is a scam as she constantly claims and not with these BS links to their filings we all know or hear about. Definite proof!

Very simple, if she can prove it...I'm gone...and will file suit against them. If she proves herself a fake...everyone will know it and...she'll be on ignore. Done.

She has recommended to posters here to sell their interests in this company...numerous times. I don't see that as requiring attention..I see it as an agenda and illegal.

This should get very interesting but I seriously doubt she'll follow through.

If you want me to take this to RB, I'll drop it here.



icon url

Gilgamash

03/27/03 11:31 PM

#33902 RE: Mattu #33898

MATT...PREGO...

Regards...Gilgamash...
icon url

Sentinel

03/27/03 11:35 PM

#33903 RE: Mattu #33898

Well put. eom
icon url

Tinroad

03/28/03 9:51 AM

#33906 RE: Mattu #33898

Matt, this board in its earlier days was an admirably free-wheeling forum for discussion of e.Digital, its technologies and activities, related developments, and its prospects. There were (and are) a few incurable optimists and snake oil sellers, but by and large the discussions were on-topic and free of personal aspersions. I personally hold Investorshub fully responsible for allowing the board to deteriorate to its present state of malicious anarchy. For two years or so, the moderators were allowed to delete posts by obvious bashers; once that power was taken away, the subsequent descent into chaos and irrelevance was guaranteed. No matter what stance you take on freedom of expression, the fact remains that there are cyber-entities whose sole purpose is to disrupt any attempts at free discussion, especially if those discussions trend towards positive opinions of the subject company. If you want to restore this board to a healthy forum for reasoned discussion of its topic, a broadsword approach will fail. The only successful remedy would be to excise from the board all of those posters unable to tolerate any opinions diverging from their own. How to discern such posters? That's the easy part - just blow away anyone who consistently trumpets the same position and heaps scorn on those who dare to dissent.