Replies to post #39663 on SK3 Group Inc. (SKTO)

[terry_mathews]

didn't you use that excuse earlier? They all ready have a filing this month/week so no delays necessary.

BTW..OTC Markets don't vet anything. They have proven time and time again they are willing to post lies.

[TenKay]

OTC DOES NOT review financials. The company does the uploading.

The post and link here may help.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=87266997

Also the 2011 and 2012 annual fins for SKTO showed up on OTC without a problem.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SKTO/filings

[zeffie]

So from my understanding, let's say that SKTO uploaded their financials on the same day as they posted them on their website and twitter feed, then it would be 3 to 5 business days from that point in time, correct? So Tuesday to Friday this week would constitute about 3 business days if I am understanding this properly?

Seeing this leads folks to understand why there is a delay, and honestly it makes logical sense since SKTO is coming out of the dark there are still going to be legal and filing hurdles that still leave a temporary stain on the credibility of SKTO..

However, the credibility as of late is shining brightly, and KA and team are proving themselves day after day with reporting, filings and accuracy of information to be a fully reporting and honest company.

So folks, although some may feel frustrated, (as I do) we also have to keep our heads up, and stay strong. It's easy to bash, nay say and trash the company, the people leading it, and to even attack their personal lives.

It is a tough battle, and even though 9 times out of 10 MOST pinkies ARE a SCAM... it's hard to shake off those feelings of doubt sometimes.. and so when people see the bashing and arguments of naysayers, some people may sell their positions, or not invest at all.. which I find unfortunate.

The key is to look at what the company is doing currently, and in the future step by step and day by day. If anything shows they are going to dilute, fraud, or anybody retracts off SKTO by denying involvement, or any current filings/PRs/financial disclosures prove false, then make a quality decision to sell or still hold, but that each individual shareholder's call.

I can be perfectly honest, and if I find anything that proves SKTO is doing anything less than their best duty to increase shareholder value and increase the effectiveness of what SKTO is doing in the MMJ market, then I will move on.. simple as that.

So while folks may want to speak negatively about SKTO, make up your mind ladies and gentleman, if this is not the stock for you, I congratulate you for being wise and making an quality decision to not touch SKTO, or to move on.

If this is the stock for you, welcome aboard, be prepared for being long, waiting through thick and thin as the, "Dream Team" builds a future for shareholder's and SKTO's unique position in the market. It may be a slow start, and we may get knocked down and around, but remember that we have to keep up the fight, and not give up our positions for shorts, or anybody else.

GLTA, SKTO long and strong! Holding proud and waiting!

~zeffie

[janice shell]

In particular, OTC Markets Group does not review, and is not responsible for confirming, the accuracy of issuer documents and information submitted to OTC Markets for inclusion on this site.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=87266013

Do I really have to call poor Brandon tomorrow? And are you championing this company?

[Sooah]

Sterling, I will confirm and support your position here because this is true and it should not be argued otherwise. Here, we are talking about OTCMarket procedures, and from the standpoint of procedures and considering SKTO CE status at the time of getting these financials to the public, documents themselves are indeed checked.

When I say 'documents' here, I am not talking about the accuracy of what is contained in the financials such as revenues or disclosures therein, but a set of documents that the OTCMarkets requires in order to remove the CE mark and display "Current Information."

All in the forum should understand that the OTCMarkets is not in the business of verifying any content of what is submitted to them, but nonetheless there are requisite documents that must be submitted and will be checked by the OTCMarkets to maintain the desired tier of an issuer.

Don't let someone tell you otherwise.

I would also like to clarify a statement I made earlier regarding consolidated financials as I had misunderstood what Sterling was saying. On the OTC Markets, a parent is not required to file consolidated financials if a sub is the main or only operating arm. The only exception to this rule is if the Parent controls the operations of the sub. The test for this is to evaluate the function of the Parent in relation to the sub, then. If you read the financials, you can readily see that SKTO provides consulting and legal services to its sub, Medical Greens, Inc. (and possibly for a fee). This does not qualify as "control" hence a consolidated financial is not required. I hope this clarifies.


disclosure: no shares of SKTO.