'Basing' equivelants that are non-exsistent sounds good or horrific if you're repetively ascribing them willy nilly as ipso facto, like the phone game with only one contestant.
Where I erred or rather, what I should have attempted was a dollar to share association instead of a percentage. It would be painstaking to tie the share price to dilution factor with all the variants but a cash to coffers comparisson under Dean over against that under Joe ... It's not dismissive by any stretch, but something tells me the gap is quite large.
Fink It's all about the story today. That is the thing some think story has changed since Dean days. The story maker Joe has wrote this story since 2009. It's same story and same result common get screwed by prefers in control. Nothing changes shares dumped, flight school still losing money, not growing etc. People who think things have changed have been learning once again wrong. Stock down 99% is the story with Joe. All he has done is create more losses for common all over again after what he did with Dean. Now he's telling people about this great merger lol. Like a profitable 20 million company would ever merger with this mess called QASP they losses money. Same as big deals Dean say were going to happen that didn't. When this ends up triple zeros again only those who ignore what Joe has done and is doing and bought will lose. To buy QASP after what Joe and Dean did and after r/s foolish moves and costly. Even traders thinking good buy time most are down. Stock price is down too much. How does those 1 cent or 2 cent buys after r/s look now? When people saying great price. Fink I said when Joe took it down to .0001 before his r/s that price was too much to pay. Any price is when you always competing with shares company neede to sell to stay open. That will never change with same people in charge. Joe.
Market Data 
Markets 
