I have asked you before and ask you again. Would you care to point out the defamation. Everything like no products, no revenue, dilution, bonuses to the exec, not following up on PR's etc can all be backed up through public records and press releases of the company.
It is only defamation if it isn't true. So please, enlighten us as to what defamation is going on here.
What? I hardly ever post on here, but what on earth was all that supposed to realistically accomplish? CBIS has given plenty of reason for doubt. The only reason I'm holding on to the stock is for some miracle opportunity to break even from an amateur buy at the peak of a pump.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
