News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Crow3

11/30/05 10:50 PM

#5715 RE: ontheedge01 #5711

You are not the one that should criticise LMOROVAN's spelling!! LOL!! "BUY" the time you go back and read what you just wrote..you should realize that.

Actually, you have no real idea what BAXA had in mind, unless you are privy to inside info more than i think that you are. Like everything else about this stock, it is all guesswork.

How many times in the sad history of LOCHCDEXCEXI has apparently positive events fizzled out?
icon url

d4diddy

07/20/06 5:32 PM

#13268 RE: ontheedge01 #5711

There were no institutional buys at 1.30/share?

Posted by: ontheedge01
In reply to: scarednomore who wrote msg# 5704 Date:11/30/2005 10:30:13 PM
Post #of 13265

Excerpt:

{i}"I may be wrong Scared, but I hope I am not, if this stock is not well above $2.00 buy the time real revenue's are annouced, then there were no institional buying."

Your track record has been.... well, not so good Edgy, but this time I think you've finally got it right!

"...if this stock is not well above $2.00 buy the time real revenue's are annouced, then there were no institional buying."