News Focus
News Focus
icon url

SevenTenEleven

04/13/13 5:31 PM

#212146 RE: tatoo1 #212145

FFGO - Well I am not sure what to make of it other than TDA is going to have a lot of explaining to do for FFGO and about a thousand other companies that they allowed market makers to naked short sell and deposit into their clients' accounts.

It is possible that risk was being assessed. It is possible that the value of FFGO has been agreed and settled upon to be $0.01 per share.

Since most of he shares held by TDA are counterfeit, they may not have an accurate idea of what their risk is unless they assign a value to all of those markers.

It would be nice if that value was $0.01. Although it is no $1 per share, $0.01 is about three times the anticipated value. It would explain why Ron was willing to pay a $0.000051 premium per share to acquire the billions of shares he is the proud owner of.

Like I said, TDA is in a tight spot. And I am certain that they are not the only retail broker flooded with counterfeit electronic equity compliments of NITE, UBSS, HDSN, PNSN, etc.

Tic Toc Text
icon url

SevenTenEleven

04/18/13 5:36 PM

#212330 RE: tatoo1 #212145

FFGO - tatoo1, hopefully someone took a screen shot of their TDA account. Requests are pouring in from around the globe for said proof.

The amount of the increase of funds in all of the various accounts showed an increase of .01 per share for the amount of FFGO shares in each account in the balance. But there was no value placed next to the FFGO symbol. A friend who had 20,000,000 FFGO shares in his account. showed an increase of $200,000.



No doubt there are ongoing issues with TDA and them being a depository for billions and billions of dollars worth of illegal naked short selling markers.

Tic Toc Text