we saw how that worked before tushi. Smitter wrote an email and got a response of "We will let our #s speak for them selves" 2 day later Chavis had to release a pr to dig the pps out of the dirt. His responsibility is to his investors. His investors want to be kept in the loop in this high risk environment. He has produced nothing that warrants the kind of trust he is asking for. The pps reflects this.
Do you think that by focusing on growing the business is a poor choice of what the CEO should be focusing on? If I was the CEO of this, or any company, I'd be working by butt off growing my business, and let the pps be based on what I was able to accomplish along those lines.
Of course the CEO needs to be focused on growing the biz BUT he also needs to spend half of his time focused on constantly branding his publico stock to the penny playing market masses!!! The pps is eventually measured by his valuation driving results...BUT if any penny company waited for ALL their valuation driving results to dictate the eventual valuation metrics that the market masses will apply to any penny stock they'd have ZERO interest and liquidity...that's penny company methodology 101!!!!!
Of course, I would work my butt off with my eye on putting a plan in place that would best result in accomplishing that growth, whether I could do it in one month or one year. If the bottom line is to actually end up with a successful ongoing and growing enterprise, should I be more concerned about that or whether a bunch of flippers of my stock are satisfied because I provided the appropriate prs that they require? That's a tough call for a CEO. That last sentence should be read as written, with tongue firmly planted in one's cheek.
The fatal flaw any penny company could EVER have is categorizing any penny player as a trader, a flipper, a scalper or a chartist and stupidly claiming that they only want longterm "investors" in their stock!!! I can show you thousands of idiot box penny company CEO's who foolishly claimed the above and every single one of them lost their market liquidity, lost the attention of the market masses and eventually reverse split when the discount shares they dished out to their funders bled their stocks down to triple zero oblivion land! That's just the nature of the beast of ALL penny co's in the penny casino...and if ANY penny company CEO ever tells anyone they're no longer concerned in the week to week perception of their stock...all they're really saying is they have ZERO clue how to manage their market or create a strong core shareholder base!!!
The only way to become a meaningful entity down here in the penny casino is to constantly brand your stock...cuz in such an ultra-competitive penny company market landscape any penny company could be the next IBM but the market masses only gravitate to and reward the penny co's who's CEO's are savvy enough to be constantly branding their stock by constantly communicating their story to market each 'n every week glty