News Focus
News Focus
icon url

F6

03/18/13 6:27 AM

#199705 RE: Crazy Money #199704

George Bush Painting Teacher Reveals His Talent as a Painter - He Loves to Paint Dogs
Published on Mar 8, 2013

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsUq8Ylkfyc [also at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oqf5dx9ckDQ ]


--


George W. Bush's Paintings: 'Best Thing He Ever Did'
Published on Mar 11, 2013

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpSTBexTzZM [also at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GOPXsaa1Fo ]


--


(linked in):

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=75241136 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=76632498 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79235117 and preceding (and any future following)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=82838064 and preceding (and any future following)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=82838077 and preceding (and any future following)


icon url

fuagf

03/18/13 6:32 AM

#199706 RE: Crazy Money #199704

President Obama VS GOP on Deficit Rachel Maddow


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZcc0tk3-4M

Rachel Maddow Calls Out The Republican Lie That Obama Has Grown Government


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuBdYVHqn00

======

Adding to the deficit: Bush vs. Obama

Since President Obama became chief executive, the national debt has risen almost $5 trillion. But how much of that was because of policies passed by Obama, and how much was caused by the ?nancial crisis, the continuation of past policies and other effects? For this analysis, we worked with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities to attach a price tag to the legislation passed by Obama and his predecessor. George W. Bush’s major policies increased the debt by more than $5 trillion during his presidency. Obama has increased the debt by less than $1 trillion. Read related article .. http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/ezra-klein-doing-the-math-on-obamas-deficits/2012/01/31/gIQAnRs7fQ_story.html [ from link ]

Ezra Klein Columnist

Doing the math on Obama's deficits



http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/adding-to-the-deficit-bush-vs-obama/2012/01/31/gIQAQ0kFgQ_graphic.html

======

Most important, funding for Iraq and Afghanistan is now included in annual budgets.
We'll keep a close eye on this one going forward, but for now, this is a Promise Kept.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/161/end-the-abuse-of-supplemental-budgets-for-war/

======




http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=83605874

in reply to that one

U.S. Deficit Shrinking At Fastest Pace Since WWII, Before Fiscal Cliff


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=83606354

oh .. hadn't heard Boehner ..

"We do not have an immediate debt crisis," Boehner said on ABC's "This Week."
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2013/03/18/Boehner-US-debt-crisis-not-immediate/UPI-56391363591800/?spt=hs&or=tn

course he'll fix it without more taxes .. Obama has had his tax hike Boehner sezzz .. why?

THE TRUTH ABOUT TAXES: Here's How High Today's Rates Really Are .. bits ..

Let's begin with a look at the top income tax bracket since the federal income tax
was started in 1913. As you can see, relative to history, it's currently VERY low.




And before you protest that INCOME taxes may be low, but the government is now gouging us a thousand
new ways, note that total government tax revenue (federal, state, and local) is actually now lower than
pretty much any time in the last 40 years. (Not as low as it was in the first half of the last century, though!)




http://www.businessinsider.com/history-of-tax-rates?op=1

debt graphs

See also:

Republicans’ balanced budget farce

The GOP refuses to acknowledge that cutting the deficit now
will only result in higher unemployment and lower wages

By Robert Reich - Thursday, Feb 14, 2013 12:56 AM +1100
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=84775668

and again

CRR decision: oppose Obama on every piece of legislation including JOBS.

only an ocean of hypocrisy can keep you your party afloat when it comes to the
economy and job creation .. which you really don't seem to really care about or you
wouldn't be supporting the GOP .. you must have seen all these by now .. some of ..

sorry pal, sick and sorry never wins in the long run ..

Did Republicans Deliberately Crash the US Economy?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=78020618

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79470097
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=80195734







icon url

tinner

03/18/13 9:15 AM

#199708 RE: Crazy Money #199704

Nitwit is very fitting handle for you...................he got handed a pile of crap and it was already 10.7 trillion and your PIMPS wouldn't raise taxes but looooooooooooooooooooved to fight wars and cut taxes. Real freaking stupid aren't you and the other CONS???????????? When did you and other CONS start to become concerned about debt? I'll wait for your stupid response!
icon url

SoxFan

03/18/13 9:54 AM

#199711 RE: Crazy Money #199704

of course someone as ill informed as you would use the number 9 trillion yet an informed person knows that when Obama took office it was already 4 months into the government's fiscal year. The appropriations were already passed and put into cement. A first year civics student knows that once an appropriation bill is signed the President HAS to spend the money as directed. So the only thing we can add that could be pinned onto Obama was the stimulus and most of that money was spent in 2010, 2011, and a little in 2012. That 2009 deficit was 1.4 trillion so you should start your counting with fiscal year 2010. Of course a Nitwit would take into consideration the war costs and also the unpaid prescription drug benefit program and the high unemployment costs that cause our deficits to spike. But then once a nitwit always a nitwit. It's such a shame as some people cannot escape their genetic make-up as it probably runs in the family.