News Focus
News Focus
icon url

solidgold

03/05/13 2:57 PM

#214502 RE: gump90 #214499

THE POST OF THE DAY!

What Ken SHOULD HAVE DONE was advise his Shareholders of Record that THEY HAD TO HOLD THEIR SHARES until an Ex Date was set by the S E C. HE DID NOT !! So much for caring for his Shareholders. This is a FACT !!!! I think he did all this deviousness ON PURPOSE to discourage loyal shareholders from selling -- SO HE COULD SELL HIS MORE EASILY. And I think it has worked out nicely -- FOR HIM. Now it's a growing MESS. Some lucky shareholders are able to sell RIGHT NOW. Some loyal people are NOT able. Yes of course there will be moans and groans soon. Is this FAIR ? ABSOLUTELY NOT !! This whole thing was soooooo badly handled.
MR. GUMP
icon url

mappo

03/05/13 3:14 PM

#214504 RE: gump90 #214499

gump .... Disagree with your opinion.
The info was with the PR, all there.
Shareholders could see and ask if not 100% sure.
Shareholders don't need any spoon-feed at all for info.
Spin-off info:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=85177532




.
icon url

Popunjay

03/05/13 6:38 PM

#214542 RE: gump90 #214499

That's right. TSX suggests that if Ken was listed there (haha) should have done just that. To bad he doesn't care...


"If the new issuance of securities is unavoidable, listed issuers should take steps to ensure that holders of
these new securities are aware that they are not fungible with the listed securities until after the due bill
trading period has ended. "

http://www.tmx.com/en/pdf/venture_bulletins/Dec10-Due-Bills.pdf