News Focus
News Focus
icon url

revenue_monster

02/23/13 8:49 AM

#113382 RE: BioChica #113379

Why are we expecting significantly higher MOS vs the previous front line study which produced 12.4 months. I am not a science guy but this defies logic. Can someone please explain?
icon url

freethemice

02/23/13 10:15 AM

#113384 RE: BioChica #113379

But he was the only one who claimed that the MOS had already been triggered. According to his timeline
that happened sometime between Oct 18 and Dec 12. If you took Oct 25 that was exactly 4 months after
the enrollment closed. So it would not be unreasonable to get 5.6 months as an estimate for the MOS.
icon url

newbieee

02/23/13 4:18 PM

#113414 RE: BioChica #113379

He might have been wrong on pancreatic but he was closer than anyone else. And after studying the MOS reported for pc and 2nd line one estimate the 1st line a little more accurately by studying every word and document that Peregrine releases.