Replies to post #2678 on T M M Inc (TMMI)

[Stewguts]

Here you are once again perpetuating the same nonsense from 12 years ago. TMMI spent millions on the development of VDK 2. You glibly assert that there was no follow through on TMMI's part when in fact the original deal was changed to somehow have the "chosen few" end up with control of the TMMI with a fraction of the amount that TMMI had contributed to Iterated over the previous years let alone Taylor Kramer's proprietary contribution as well.

You sir, have proven once again your duplicitous involvement in what I believe has been a grave injustice committed against the shareholders of TMMI so many years ago. What really gets my blood boiling is that the "chosen few" expect to profit off of the backs of TMMI shareholder through the funds created for DFI via the sale of TMMI shares to the unsuspecting public.

Simply amazing.

[zenus]

4retire, I still don't get why you are so fixated on VDK 2.0 for IBM PVS/SGI mainframe systems? I am sure it's nice for TMMI to have, but they announced that it is not essential for their current business model. I will just assume they know what they are doing, but I guess you can disagree if you want.

Sure, maybe 20 years ago, you had to run the code on mainframe computers cause it supposedly took hours just to compress 10 minutes of video back then. But you realize that a nVidia graphics card you can purchase for a few hundred dollars runs circles around any old 'supercomputer'.

It seems obvious that you got alot of information from somebody outside TMMI about what is going on. But are you sure everything you were told was correct?