Thanks for that Sir. As an example of dilution not always being bad is URHN. They had 66m shares, then issued 5.6b shares, then reduced it to 2.3b, & now 1.7b, but the stock went from .0014@5.66b to .04@1.7b. Make what you will of it, I'm not trying to determine anything specific besides the fact that if shares/notes are issued resulting in the funds being properly placed, this should turn out to produce a large gain for shareholders as of now. Thanks again.