News Focus
News Focus
icon url

On2_addict

02/12/13 11:28 AM

#76811 RE: 136 #76810

The problem is that you report all different numbers which change continually. First you buy at .33, and now it was in the .20s

You say it is going up over .50 and then when it goes down you say that you sold at .49

You can claim to have bought at the lows and sold at the highs, but since you always seem to do it after the fact it is very unlikely that anybody will take you seriously.

I do not blame them.
icon url

On2_addict

02/12/13 11:29 AM

#76812 RE: 136 #76810

Like this post from yesterday.

ONCE PAST .40, NO RESISTANCE TILL .50 !

Was that when you were trying to sell? Don't find that a bit dishonest?
icon url

ddm1082

02/12/13 11:30 AM

#76813 RE: 136 #76810

No I understand. Though your cost basis keeps changing... 500k at .38, bought at .20.... whateva!
icon url

On2_addict

02/12/13 11:31 AM

#76814 RE: 136 #76810

Here is anther one from yesterday. What changed since then. LOL

You posted:

$MJNA FLYING TODAY! Seeing .50+ !

AUDIT NEWS! UPLISTING! 35 MILLION DOLLAR DEAL !

WHAT'S NOT TO LIKE?

$MJNA
icon url

marklar3

02/12/13 11:52 AM

#76831 RE: 136 #76810

No, I definitely did understand that lol. It's what I've been trying to get across. What I think you don't realize, is that a piece of your strategy (and I can't say for sure how substantial a role it actually plays) is now tainted.

By preserving your image of a consistent long who sometimes, "out of the kindness of his heart," posts charts to "warn" the board of a possible move up or down, you were actually able to guide the pps at times (not sure how successfully, but before I called you out yesterday I matched up your posts giving a clear warning of a break with the actual chart at that time and I bet people would be surprised at just how successful you have actually been).

Now that you admit that you play both ways, this might prove to be a tougher challenge ... I guess we will have to wait and see.