News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Kakaobaron

02/08/13 2:39 PM

#4454 RE: kennypooh #4452

Hmmmmmm.......maybe even the problem could be a benefit to us? If D-20 should be formulated at the user, each user would need a NPU.....and if you any spend 70,000 USD per month on fuel, you would probably not mind investing in a NPU if it pays off in the long run......or possibly ECOS should make a discount NPU/Mini NPU which could be affordable to the farmers? Who says it needs to make xx thousand gallons per hour?

I know I'm dreaming, but why not?
icon url

was Honey Badger

02/08/13 3:24 PM

#4458 RE: kennypooh #4452

Kenny: Well put!

If D-20, or similar, was non corrosive to our existing pipelines and storage tanks, and distribution would not be a problem, and we could have something REALLY BIG.



I noticed from the Wiki link:

However, for optimizing engine performance, fuel availability, toxicity and political advantage, a blend of ethanol, methanol and petroleum is likely to be preferable to using any of these individual substances alone."



I'd guess D-20 qualifies as a blend, with emulsified water, so chances are pretty high that corrosive nature of methanol is less of a factor.

Cool beans! HB