News Focus
News Focus
icon url

emptyone

02/07/13 5:59 PM

#29187 RE: ccsykes #29186

Chad you did an excellent job taking us down to 40 cents and looking for excuses in your investment books. Seriously how about giving us real information like the time table on the FN listing... is that too much to ask...good luck on your next venture...
icon url

challe08

02/08/13 5:50 AM

#29229 RE: ccsykes #29186

Chad I'm sorry to inform you but this won't give you any cred among the shareholders in Siaf (either) "You should one day ask Solomon where he thinks the Company might be today if we hadn't met." since 99,9% of us would be better of right now if Siaf would never existed.
But I will now give you a unique and tailor-made opportunity to recover the Sh's confidence, the Bod will be happy and you will also be able to lift the debate-climate in here...in short you have the chance to be a hero just by answering one very simple question that actually should be the most easiest q to answer for you.

What are your most compelling arguments/"evidence" that Siaf is just not another Chi-scam??

And please don't come dragging with some photos on Facebook, Sec filings or other things that we already have access to in here. I also don't want to hear anything about that you are prohibited to enclose any information, since it is not that kind of information I am after. It is a question that you could face any day when doing I/R and therefore, I guess, you should have answered hundred of times before....and if never answered, it should definitely occupy your thoughts a lot!
You have been in this company almost from day 1 and hopefully you know a lot of things about Solomon and Siaf that never will be in any filings but still would be very valuable for the Sh's to hear/know about, from the horses mouth so to speak. Also you have experience from trading so you can not be that unfamiliar what goes on in an investors mind.
You should probably be able to write a whole book about this, but I will settle for less also.

Thanx in advance...over to you....the World is listening :-)!
icon url

Helium-3

02/08/13 11:02 AM

#29281 RE: ccsykes #29186

Hey Chad, from reading your post it appears that you will no longer continue as the IR person. Question - was this a decision that you made or did the company chose not to renew your contract?