what don´t you get? if you suddenly go overboard from all previous prognose and start giving out another 16m shares without an explanation don´t you get that this is the proper reactions to that behaviour? or is an extra 16m shares a non event in your opinion not worthy of a lousy capex update? then it really is questionable if you understands the shareholders of the company and the duties attached to the title...
Chad... everyone thought back in September that we would be able to achieve a PPS of $2 by year end, and rightly so.
Solomon issued an additional 14M shares when he said he wouldn't just weeks earlier, and when asked about it he didn't want to discuss it. The result... an 80% loss of value to shareholders on top of 2 years of non-performance.
None of your BS means anything when the facts are in front of your eyes. Solomon is a serial diluter and destroyer of PPS. A destroyer of confidence and a destroyer of shareholder value. Shareholders should not be paying the price for his failure to communicate. I hereby request his resignation effective immediately.
Chad--I think what Stolpen and others are saying is with many cos. it's possible to call IR and get intermediate period updates on events that occur that are not well-understood. Some companies welcome and in fact encourage those calls. With SIAF that does not seem possible. Clearly either management is not willing to give IR the information necessary to update investors or, they feel, you have not pressed management hard enough to make them aware of the importance of doing so. I suspect the answer is the former. But we should know for sure what the case is, by whatever means that is accomplished.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
