News Focus
News Focus
icon url

xlt leader

02/01/13 4:13 PM

#26221 RE: flyersdh #26213

I disagree with your thesis. I do see a short squeeze and 20-30% is laughable after a ruling. We will see who is right here. Mark my post I challenge your thesis.
icon url

LOL

02/01/13 4:52 PM

#26225 RE: flyersdh #26213

A 20-30% move, the stock does that on a good motion by IP, final ruling will be much bigger than that. One cannot discount a short squeeze will occur, how that will impact the price who knows, could just add another dollar or could add ten dollars, no one has any idea. An appeal works both ways, and more in Vringos favor than Googles. Vringo has more to gain from an appeal, as they will be going after full pre-trial damages, Google pretty much already won pre-trial, so they risk losing there. We have still yet to see what the judge will set for running royalties, but obviously Google has to pay something. The appellate court is only to consider if the trial court judge made a mistake, thus an appeal, but so far no one has mentioned any mistakes against Google, only Vringo on the laches decision. I want an appeal, because I want the full past damages. An appeal is a plus for Vringo, not a negative, no two ways around that. Also, this is not a one trial company, now they have Google, Microsoft, and ZTE going, plus who knows what else behind the curtain.

This is not to be misconstrued as bashing, merely an outside opinion



Sorry, your post is a little too obvious for that to be true ;)