Replies to post #235 on scans

[unspokenvoice]

Thanks Fred

Any insights/criticism you (or anyone else, for that matter) might have would be great.

I recently moved from penny stocks, where scans weren't terribly helpful. But I'm quite happy with the move. Partially because I enjoy creating scans so much.

Quick question, if you don't mind.

I've noticed that you (and others here) use parameters for your MAs that seem uncommon to me.
From your Wave Nesting scan:

[daily sma(18) > daily sma(9)] and
[daily sma(36) > daily sma(18)] and
[daily sma(72) > daily sma(36)] and
[daily sma(144) > daily sma(72)] and
[daily sma(288) > .96*daily sma(144)] and
[daily sma(576) > .92*daily sma(288)]

How'd you come up with those parameters?