= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =8-27-12 At that time, I decided to let him know his makeover didn’t go unnoticed by me:
8-27-12/SA - Patrick, tell me again why you dropped your name and went “anonymous” with this PPHM hatchet job, and switched the date from Aug24 to Aug27 when you copy/pasted the original one it over from your esteemed “Chimera Research Group” website? => There’s not an honest bone in your body, Patrick Crutcher. You know it yourself, and now a ton of other people do too. I know I’ll never believe another word you write – ABOUT ANYTHING.
COPY OF: 8-24-12 “PPHM – More downside expected in Peregrine Pharmaceuticals” AUGUST 24, 2012, Chimera Research Group “There appears to be significant reason to be cautious with this name. . .” etc etc etc http://www.chimeraresearchgroup.com/2012/08/quick-analysis-on-peregrine-pharmaceuticals DISCLOSURE: “No position currently, but considering Sept. $2.50 puts.” . . = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = As opposed to:
1-11-11: “Peregrine Seems Poised For Growth In 2011” by Patrick Crutcher http://biomedreports.com/2011011162299/peregrine-poised-for-growth-in-2011.html Back then you said you were LONG on PPHM, and you wrote, “BAVITUXIMAB is an extremely interesting molecule which has created a lot of buzz over the past 2 years; not just in oncology but also as a potent anti-viral. . . PPHM entered into an ATM with MLV to the tune of $75 million. WE VIEW THIS DEAL POSITIVELY, since it allows them to raise capital as share price increases and it is not selling them at a discount to a fund. They have one of the best un-partnered pipelines amongst small-cap biotechs and WE ARE EXCITED ABOUT THE POTENTIAL OVER AT PEREGRINE.”