Replies to post #96156 on SPO Networks Inc (SPOI)

[Johnny4profits]

That's a reported fact!
That noted incident cost the company business and I absolutely agree with that practice of non-disclosure. In fact, I'd have no problem at all with zero disclosure if HTI were a private company operating on private funding. But they aren't, clearly they aren't. Somehow the credibility gap needs to be filled without divulging critical sensitive and proprietary information. The hopes in a promise that HLNT will become fully reporting in accordance with the OTC will perhaps resolve much of the reservations in the investment community, including qualifying for institutional funds such as from this information nearly a year ago:

INSTITUTION HOLDINGS: http://investors.morningstar.com/ownership/shareholders-overview.html?t=HLNT
Vigilant Capital Management LLC 350,000 SHARES 3/31/12

OK GUYS, I think people have forgot about the problem years back when the mention the state police who cancelled a deal because of to many calls about the product, you all forgot that, and the reason why names were to given out. the last PR that gave the name received calls also.

Would like to know another stock that gives out numbers.
Does APPLE, MICROSOFT, HP tell us how many the produce and by whom, NO they don't so why should HLNT do it so people can call and hazzle them. NO I DON'T THINK SO

.

BE SURE TO HIT YOUR "FOLLOW BOARD" IN SUPPORT OF YOUR HLNT STOCK INTERESTS.
.

[shrewdop]

Apples and oranges. Tying up a state police switchboard with inane calls has potential danger. On the other hand, all HTI/AHS has to do is alert whoever the big deal goes down with and add an ad hoc extension to the phone with a recorded message or a person with a brief prepared statement, heck, HTI could offer to pick up the cost of the inconvenience. But it is not the same as a state police switchboard...


HLNT 1 RINGY-DINGY, 2 RINGY-DINGY, "YES, HELLO, IS THIS THE PARTY TO WHOM I AM NOW SPEAKING?"