RoadLessTraveled, you bring up some interesting areas of focus. There is a reluctance for some parties to even acknowledge that the company has done anything wrong. There is a reluctance for other parties to even acknowledge that NSS exists or could exist in FFGO.
There should more focus on action. You cannot achieve any actionable results if many possibilities are left off the table. To get legal or regulatory action, you have to focus on what is a specific reality now and then move outward on what could be a reality.
Shorty has been a reality for a long time, to me. That is more of a static thing. The company's inaction and intent is dynamic as the inaction has consequences that unfold in a legal and financial way. I have been shifting my focus on this unfolding trend.
I agree that the company (NMGL or FFGO) may be no help in getting relief from any NSS or even a dividend. As far as speculation that the company might actually have participated in NSS, I don't know. If the company was actually involved in NSS, any lawsuit would become much easier in my opinion. Intent and fraud would be very clear. Right now, for me, it is cloudy. There are actions that the company has taken that seem genuine and legitimate, there are actions that are fraudelent in my opinion.
I have contacted several lawfirms. I have 3 more lawfirms that I intend to contact very soon.
Market Data 
Markets 
