Slither? Well, besides the 'moderator' refering to me as a 'crook', I will move past that and to the substance of your new claim.
1. Zami blew a hole in my 'offense'.
Besides that being a bizarre thing to suggest, it is wrong. What Zami did do is give an 'example' of the types of secret discussions that you and Paul had and the substance of those discussions.
Zami also suggested that YOU are still unable to come clean about what Paul told you and that Zami has to step up to the plate for you.
He proved my point. While he may like you, because you decided to leak things to him HIM offline that Paul told you, he also made a very big point that you missed.
E
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
