I agree xlt, and the thesis also ignores the trajectory of revenues, which, even in the unlikely event the Court does not augment the jury past award rate to the forward rate (and again, this is HIGHLY unlikely, as case law makes clear, and would be contrary to the ONLY evidentiary award rate which is 10 times higher), GOOG's infringing revenues are leaping year over year, such that even this low probability lowest case scenario, the award would still approach $200 million.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
