Chief over the years I have signed up for many penny stock pick sites and newsletters. Usually when a stock is being promoted I see it show up on these sites or in emails they send out. In 2 years I have never seen AUCI ever show up. They put out PR's but like I said IMO not widely promoted. With OTC IMO it takes more then just issuing a PR to get your stock to a wide audience. Maybe I'm wrong but in my expereince with penny stocks since the early 90's they have to be promoted. Some over promote as well. Once you do promotion and a lot of people know about the company then stop. This in last 2 years has not been a P & D. Shares issued from what I see have been for merger. With Amero merger being undone if the shares don't come back then that sucks to. Unlike other stocks with bad track records as P & D and still same company/players in control I have not seen that here. It always can change.
Question. What would you consider worse for common shareholders. A company that issued over 1.5 billion shares built nothing. Then did 1 for 1000 r/s. Then kept a/s at 475 million. Then issued over 30 million after r/s. Wiped out common who invested. Then down 90% since that r/s.
or AUCI no r/s and issued 700 million? Is a new company with new management?
IMO a P & D that issued billions of shares, does 1 for 1000 r/s, and then issues 30 million more is much worse for investors. Then leaves 475 million a/s after r/s. Mainly because they built no company with much harm to shareholders with little to no revenue growth. They wiped out common with that r/s who invested. A management that shows common they don't care at all about them. This is were the truth showed up from a company that did that. yet he tells us AUCI is bad lol. That stock was at .0001 when 1 for 1000 r/s done. 10 cents after. Now subpenny. Also a company that lied in PR's.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
