I do not think it is a negative in any way as far as results or quality of the ore or mine.
I think it was Bad for Scott to revel his hand first.
He should have let them tell us what they got and if there was a discrepancy he would know they are not making a fair deal and to watch his back.
It would also allow him to come back at them with his results of their sample.
This would give him the leverage to suggest a third party test to seal the deal at a higher price to them if the results are what Scott said, and a lower price if the Chinese testing was correct,
Scott (knowing his results are valid) would be in a position of power in the deal. It also would have earned him some respect from the other side.
People will try make this statement say what they want but I am being pretty clear
Your point of the a disagreement of value would have to be backed by a publication of some sort of the Chinese results. Otherwise it could not be believed.
Like I said we wont know their results. Their results will either say it is worth it or not. The only sign we will get as to their opinion will be a deal or a PR stating we are no longer in negotiations.
Gap up or gap down, No other option I don't think
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
