I have to disagree. I am sure the ugly facts are not the most welcome thing in a room full of people who dont want to see them but those "IMO Statements" have a place here just like the "slander" of people claiming Scott is gods gift to mining and the rocks are worthy of worship.
Besides the fact that Scott has been untruthful is not IMO at all it is obvious.
What it the truth about the CTO?
Scott reported something that was not true. They were forced to redact it and make a new 43-101.
What is the truth about the Divi? Scott told shareholders the record date would be announced a year ago. Did that happen or was that also not the truth?
I have no problem saying he lied. I have no problem saying when he didnt. I have no problem pointing out Scott's losses. And the only problem I have pointing out his wins is he doesnt seem to be making any.
This board is FOR "IMO statements" PRs and filings are made for facts (Or are supposed to be).
Why would you even think that anyway? Dont you constantly post IMO statements about Scott and the company? ALL IMO statements from ANYONE who has one is welcome here.
It doesnt matter what anyone thinks about them. This site is in the USA and last I looked I had the right to say "IMO Statements" any time.
Scott lies to the share holders. The CTO says it isnt JUST IMO either. It is IMO...In MANY Opinions.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
