InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

bzone3

12/02/12 9:38 AM

#59210 RE: usandy #59209

I have to believe the receiver will at a minimum remove the share from Turrini!!! What a joke of a CEO. I also feel Daic shares should be limited being that he apparently is due 28% of the TMOB settlement. Everyone knows Daic doesn't deserve his millions of shares
icon url

HighRider

12/02/12 9:58 AM

#59211 RE: usandy #59209

I would guess that depends on how they got their shares. I don't think you can take away legitimately purchased shares, but anybody coming forward now will have to face the srutiny of the Receiver. The receiver appears to have the authority to do what he wants in regard to any shares not obtained in a legitimate manner, if there are any out there.
icon url

litton51

12/02/12 10:16 AM

#59212 RE: usandy #59209

Forget the BOD. The December, 2011, theft gives 28% of any damages to Daic.
icon url

On2_addict

12/02/12 4:59 PM

#59215 RE: usandy #59209

Why should BOD members be entitled to shares when they were never elected by shareholders???

Or put another way. Should unelected BOD members be allowed to award themselves shares???