Yes, that is positive. I just don't like the fact that I was basically scolded for a not so flattering critique of the results from the most recent quarter. I don't think anyone should be happy with the numbers, no mater what their position is with the company.
Specially those in charge. What if the EPA has issues with the application? Then what? The PPS is low enough even with the anticipation of the positive EPA response. If it was based solely on the dirt, it would plunge to depths no one here could stomach. Again, where am I wrong?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
