Replies to post #115246 on Strategic Asset Leasing Inc (fka LEAS)

[MaskedCat]

I see your hope, but I am wondering if that were the case, namely the RS would be followed by a merger, then why would not he have announced chat as a target of the "moving forward" ? RR

[Lumberg]

This sums it up fairly well Shinebox. The value of the land should grossly reflect in the share price. Even with the RS, it should still reflect that. I think this RS was tickling most people's think tank at one point or another. The dillution a few months back had RS written all over it. But, "since pricing per acreage comparable to MMTE has increased substantially over the last three years" one would suggest we are at no bid cellar dwelling status simply due to poor management. Grant it, the lithium mining situation in Chile is not helping, but the actual value of lithium should still maintain that respective value.
I can deal with the RS, but the repeated failure of following up with statements and PR's with lengthy periods of silence is what bothers me the most. What are we expected to believe? These concessions we no longer listed on recent mining maps as mentioned by Nemo,I believe, a few weeks ago perhaps suggesting some forward movement. Many didn't expect that movement to be thrown into "Reverse". Liar??Perhaps.. Rinse and repeat share selling maching? Perhaps..but as Ricky use to say, Willie! Yous got some s'plaining to do"

[LODE MAKING ME RICH]

I don't expect a lot of good here either, I just posted what the different amounts of RS ratios come out to, nothing more, nothing less. :-)