Replies to post #83000 on Imagination TV Inc. (IMTV)

[Da Ghost]

ICPA

Steve,

Many have issue , hence the current PPS,

If you have an issue with our corporate practice of only referring to the Q's and K, you should not invest in our company.

Nobody should invest in this company ..your posts are mostly poppycock .

ICPA pos. All da way :-D

[JohnCM]

Hello Steve... Actually the only portion of the post that was mine is a silly comment about fund raising for T/A fees. On a serious note, this is not a concern of mine at the moment. But I am glad that you were able to use my post and quote to clarify your position on this matter. Thank you for your response.


JohnCM Monday, November 05, 2012 2:40:28 PM
Re: Rich post# 82943 Post # of 83015

"Focus on the TA is gagged. NOT TRUE.

It IS true. The T/A is GAGGED!!!

Samblis says it's to save the company money, LMAO!!!"

Let's stage a fund raising effort after the one for Sandy, and raise money to ungag the T/A.



Samblis ICPA Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:39:35 AM
Re: JohnCM post# 82945 Post # of 83015

"John,

That is partly true only, so as a whole, your post is incorrect...a half truth.

The money was a small part of our decision to only use our Q's and K to announce the share structure. Q's and the K tell the entire story of where we are. This is because they include the reason for any change.

Monthly fluctuations not backed up with documents of why there may be changes in share amounts do not tell the entire story.

If you have an issue with our corporate practice of only referring to the Q's and K, you should not invest in our company."

[Hattori Hanzo]

As the "executive", its solely your responsibility to bring value to shareholders. I demand an explanation regarding the price of this stock. I am not interested in hearing about how you have no control in where buyers and sellers decide to meet, it's on you to motivate these buyers and sellers to meet near a pps that's valuable to the shareholders. Just looking at the chart, I see a huge front load in late January, early February with no pps increase, then I see a double topped rocket shortly thereafter with equal volume distributed over a longer period than the accumulation took. So as the CEO, tell me, was your pre and post rocket pps reflective of the company, or was the .04-.05 range a better reflection? And if so, why isn't it still up there? Who are the other 2 individuals that DID sell shares? How are they connected to ICPA? Seems like they picked the "perfect" time to sell, wouldn't you say?

[B402]

Best to wait Till after a 90% Shellacking


To let the Shareholders find out Why???


With More CDs in the Mix and a 2bil AS

McDonalds and Apple are safe Eh