News Focus
News Focus
icon url

pollyvonwog

10/27/12 3:34 PM

#9839 RE: io_io #9838

Why not? What do you really know about it?



I know I was right about no one being able to replicate enox like MNTA, except when their process got jacked. Even WPI was completely blind-sided when Ampha got approved.

They are the facts according to this board. I think when you have the legal decision of the courts, overturning those facts, you should be accepting.



What facts are you referring too? The majority opinion blatantly misconstrued safe harbor to expand beyond approval. Like I mentioned in a previous post, if this case had the same panel as Classen vs Biogen, they PI never would have been lifted.

There is a multitude of IP lawyers on the web who have written on the subject who also side with "this board."

Hell, an analyst for WPI/TEVA sides with this board. What is your point?

I guess we'll see how it turns out. I guess you like to ignore Rader's dissent... Or the original district court decision.....etc

TEVA will.



lol.

I can't believe I just responded to you :<

PS: What else do you want here? You've gotten your wish. MNTA approaching 52 week lows, Lovenox making Mnta peanuts, no m-copax until 2048 etc. Congrats!
icon url

alertmeipp

10/27/12 9:50 PM

#9842 RE: io_io #9838

io_io - any other play worth looking?