Replies to post #9075 on Intl BioChemical Industries Inc fka IBCL

[Lownumba]

Penelope, you seem to be a bright person. If you don't mind my asking, why didn't you confirm a, b, and c and only then buy IBCL?

[fadeshti]

you are sharp! it was you that i was referring to.
i read all of your posts as natalee on the RB board and you were kind of my guage and still are. This whole thing deserves absolutly no praise at present and I almost felt some coming from you. I do respect your DD, you definately are an asset to any board.

[Dakota Dad]

If I were the CEO of a company and owned a lot of shares in it I would do my darndest to make those shares worth more. That, IMO, would benefit all shareholders.

Dakota

[LostMyDonkey]

Penelope, when Nova was formed it was 100% owned by IBCL... I dont see where that changed untill this Q came out.. That is my gripe with the whole thing!!!

[guy20817]

I agree - the fact that the key scientists that led to the patent are gone is not a problem for a company, that is, in effect, now a simple seller of products. Except for the need for FDA approval, which requires another set of experts, having a marketing company is what is needed.


Regards,
guy20817